What should a scientist do if the results of a study do not support their hypothesis?

A scientist should consider modifying the hypothesis based on recent results. This approach acknowledges that science is a dynamic process where hypotheses are continually tested and refined in light of new evidence. When initial results do not support the hypothesis, rather than discarding it immediately, the scientist has the opportunity to analyze the data further and potentially discover deeper insights. This process can lead to a better understanding of the factors at play, which may inform a revised or new hypothesis that is more aligned with observed outcomes.

By embracing this iterative process, scientists contribute to a more robust body of knowledge, as opposed to simply rejecting a hypothesis without further examination. Remaining flexible and open to modification ultimately strengthens scientific inquiry and promotes more accurate conclusions.